Friday, March 30, 2012

The Other Wes Moore Project












1.  Both of the Wes Moore’s grew up in similar situations. The author of this story is raised by his mom along with his two sisters.  The other Wes is raised by his mother along with his brother who goes back and forth between his mother and fathers house.  They both act like protectors and “man of the house,” being that one lost his father at an early age and the other never knew his.  They both had points in their lives where school was unimportant because of the pressure from their neighborhoods and the struggle to fit in. 

These two men grew up in poor neighborhoods and had to struggle with drugs and gangs living all around them.  They both had enough influential people in their lives to help to guide them, but their stubborn ways had other paths for them.  When I read this book it was a little confusing to distinguish between the two because of their names and similar situations.  You definitely have to re-read some areas to find out who we are focusing on. 

2.  For the author of the book, his turning point was when he was sent to military school.  He was failing his classes in school from what appeared to be boredom.  He takes advantage of the fact that he is the only boy and his mother’s threat of sending him to military school is just to scare him.  He crosses the line when he hits his sister in the face causing her lip to bleed.  He was taught at a young age that you never hit women and he pushed too far.  When he first gets to the military school he hates it and is mad at the world.  He tries to escape and eventually succumbs to his surroundings.  He grows to love it and appreciate the second chance he was given and is able to fulfill his dreams and make something of himself.  From military school he attends Oxford University and easily moves on through life with accomplishments he never thought he would have achieved. 

 The other Wes Moore had a lot more to struggle with.  He became a father very early on in life with two different women.  When he saw how bad off his second girlfriend was with her drug addiction, he realized that he couldn’t take it anymore.  He wanted out of the drug business and wanted to make something of himself.  He joins the job corps and realizes that even though he missed a lot of school he is able to catch up and get his GED.  He is able to pick a profession that he is good at and makes him happy.  He becomes skilled in carpentry and is inspired to build a miniature house for his daughter.  He unfortunately buckles under the pressure of trying to take care of his mom and his four kids and returns to his old habits.

3.  The author of the book started out well with both parents.  Even though he was very young when his father passed away, he learned very important lessons from him.  His mother knowing what it feels like to struggle wanted the best for her son.  She was abused by her first husband and knew that was not the way to live.  After the passing of the second husband she knows that the best way to raise her kids was with the help of her parents.  Wes grows up with strict rules highly enforced by his grandparents.  He is respectful and also attends a private school far from the neighborhood.  His mother wants the best for him, and after he falls behind she surprises him by sending him to military school.  He is surrounded by people throughout his life that want to help and to see him succeed.

The other Wes grows up with a mother who is struggling with doing the best she can.  She has two sons from two different fathers.  Wes feels at a young age that he is the man of the house and needs to protect his mom.  When he sees her crying, he refuses to leave without an answer.  His mother got pregnant at 16 but retained her goals of attending school and being the first to go to college.  Her mother passes away when her firstborn is young and her father is an alcoholic.  Her second son, Wes has a father who is an alcoholic too.  He visits his father’s mother despite his father never playing a part in his life.  His mother works all the time and his brother falls through the cracks and becomes involved in drug dealings.  With no positive male role model, Wes looks upon becoming just like his brother, Tony, which his mother and Tony fight against every day.  Unfortunately he becomes a father at a young age to four kids and relies on the drug business to pay for all his financial burdens.  He hits an all time low that sends him to life in prison.

4.  This book shows that human behavior is highly influenced by both nature and nurture.  In both cases nurture takes place with the mothers working hard to try and raise their kids the best they can.  They try to provide for them but from working so hard they miss some of the signs that show when the boys start falling down.  The nature part is the impact that the neighborhoods have on these kids.  The author tries to play it cool with the neighborhoods kids even though he goes to a better, fancier school then they do.  This causes him to slack off and get into minor indiscretions, such as the spray painting incident.  The other Wes falls even harder with his mom being gone all the time and drugs being easily accessible.  He feels like this is the best way to make money so he can keep up with the latest gear, just like his brother. 

There are similar patterns between these two boys.  They both start off as innocent bystanders in a harsh community.  The best they have is what their mothers can provide and the rest they need to figure out for themselves.  The first Wes panics the first time he gets in trouble with the police.  He cries and prays that his mother will never find out.  Military school helps him to become a stronger person, despite the issue he faces when the car tried to run him down and he is stuck in the face with something hard.  He learned that fighting back is not the answer.  The second Wes had the crap beat out of him by his brother who was doing the best he could to protect his brother and help him to not end up like him.  Wes never gives up on trying making money and unfortunately ends up with the same fate as his brother of life in prison for a crime gone wrong.

5.  The thing that I like about the book was the similarities between two strangers.  I have always found it fascinating when I meet a person with the same name as me, or born around the same time.  You can’t help but wonder what else could be in common aside from a name.  I like that the author was so intrigued by the fact that another man with his name could be so similar and yet so different, I like the fact that he reached out to this stranger to find out who the “Other Wes Moore” was.  He also tries to imagine what it would have been like if they were in each other’s shoes.  I have often wondered what it would be like to be someone else, to live in a different time, a different situation, to have a different family.  He almost gets to experience that feeling because of how much they have in common.

The only complaint about the book was that it got a little confusing differentiating between the two Wes’s.  Having the same name made it hard to keep track of who was who and who was doing what.  Other than that I really enjoyed reading this book.  It is sad how hard their lives were growing up, and it really makes you appreciate what you have in life.  It is also amazing how they both end up completely the opposite of each other.  I wonder if fate would have been the same if they actually knew each other growing up.  Would one have influenced the other?  Could they both have ended up the same?  

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Corporations Vs. Citizens

The issue at hand is whether or not corporations have the same right as citizens when involved in choosing our political candidates.  Well a corporation defined by dictionary.com is “an association of individuals, created by law or under authority of law, having a continuous existence independent of the existences of its members, and powers and liabilities distinct from those of its members.” The answer is right here!!  It’s an association that exists independently from its members.  I would consider it more like a thing than a being the first amendment talks about the freedom of speech.  It doesn’t say anything about bribing other people and other corporations so that they can have their way.  How would that make them equal when one has the upper hand?   

Of course there are always two sides to a story.  Citizens United, as already noted are a non-profit conservative media company.  When looking at their website they claim that they are “an organization dedicated to restoring our government to citizens' control. Through a combination of education, advocacy, and grass roots organization, Citizens United seeks to reassert the traditional American values of limited government, freedom of enterprise, strong families, and national sovereignty and security. Citizens United's goal is to restore the founding fathers' vision of a free nation, guided by the honesty, common sense, and good will of its citizens.  If this is what they truly believe in, then why did they try to get the Fahrenheit 9/11 banned when Michael Moore was only trying to let the people see the truth behind the Bush family and elections?  That movie was a way of alerting people to connections that people with money can have.  We saw the connections that were made and we were left to make our own decisions to make.  Then Citizens United contradicted themselves by making their own documentary, this time attacking Hillary Clinton.  So at this point they are only trying to make freedom of speech ok for corporations and not individuals such as Michael Moore. 
Justice Stevens believes that “... the patronage system was a misuse of government power; the government has a duty to act impartially.”  This shows that the government needs to act fair and not rely on other sources to sell them out.  The citizens of this country are hard working people with only their voices as their weapon and if corporations want to be treated the same then they should only use their voices without the influences that money has to offer.  Corporations use their numbers against the citizens.  As pointed out by Susan Mckevitt, “We have to get back to one person, one vote, and not have it be millionaires count and the common people don't,"

From everything I have read my decision stands firm that corporations don’t have the rights of individual citizens.  As previously stated one person one vote is the way it should be.  Not a corporation with hundreds of members.  Each of those members needs to act independently in order to be fair.  Corporations use their power and money to influence decisions made that leads to the people we have running the country.  How is that considered equal when each individual only has their opinion and their voice to offer?  The Preamble to the constitution states “We the people,” not “We the corporations.” 










Facts:
“Organization dedicated to restoring government…”
http://www.citizensunited.org/who-we-are.aspx

Justice Stevens “patronage system is a misuse….”
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130198344

Susan Mckevitt “one person one vote….”
http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/315246/petitioned-warrant-articles-decry-citizens-united-case?SESSc32f76032d4fb31db2659f73b6732bfa=google&page=full




Thursday, March 8, 2012

Justice is served??


This week’s topic is such a controversial one.  On one hand we have people saying that yes we should kill criminals that have preyed on innocent victims and left life scarring effects on families and loved ones.  Then we have people saying that the death penalty is wrong because then it makes us just as wrong to kill someone, a life for a life, and the ones who have to issue the execution are also scarred for life.  So what is the answer to this question?  If we use lethal injection as a tool for justice then we are setting an example to others and possibly preventing more people from committing similar crimes.  If we allow people to sit in prison and “think about what they have done,” then you are allowing them to live their life while others were not spared.  Not only do they get to live, but get the taxpayers to pay for their life behind bars.  They may not be able to live freely in society, but technology has allowed them to keep up with everything that is going on.  Many prisoners have access to TV, internet, and phones allowing them to connect with the outside world.  Even those who are on a tight lock down have managed ways of communicating beyond bars through a system of codes and can therefore have outside sources fill their places and continue to kill.  I think that the death penalty should remain as an example to others.  I believe that it does help in many ways to stop violence.  With today’s technology and advances in the criminal investigation world, we are better able to target killers allowing us to finalize our decision to execute them without the feeling that we have killed an innocent person.  Honestly, if you really think about it, the lethal injection is still an easy way out for criminals. 
Many people are against the death penalty for a variety of reasons.  Gandhi once said, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”  He is pointing out that two wrongs don’t make a right and he is correct in some aspects.  But if wonder if the people who are against the death penalty have ever put themselves into the shoes of a person who has lost a loved one in a tragic way.  A man comes in and kidnaps your eight year old daughter.  He then rapes her, tortures her, and then viciously kills her.  He then hides her body in an undisclosed area hoping she will never be found and then he goes home and pretends like nothing happens.  That family is now frantically searching for their little girl and are tormented by the thoughts of who took her and what did they do.  Months later her body is discovered and this family will never again be the same.  The innocent life of this child has been taken.  When the murderer is discovered, all evidence points to him and he gets to sit in prison for the rest of his life.  The family gets to sit there and think about how this man is just laying in bed in a prison that feeds him, gives him medical care, and allows him pleasures such as books, games, and tv.  Is it right that the murderer gets a chance at life after committing such a heinous crime?  Desmond Tutu is quoted saying “To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.”   Using the example from above, revenge would be defined if the family went out themselves and hunted him down to kill him themselves in the same manner as the little give.  Justice plays a role by allowing this murderer to die in a more humane way by lethal injection.  All he has to do is simply lie down while toxins are put in his body and he is put to a permanent sleep.  How is that revenge?  Albert Camus, a French philosopher once said, “Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders.”  Well sometimes we have to weed out the criminals and rid the world of them.  We have pests all over the country such as insects and mice that constantly are killing crops which leads to people suffering.  We solve this problem by killing them with pesticides and other means to protect our crops.  We purposely plan out the deaths of these creatures when they were put on this earth and are doing what their DNA tells them to in order to survive.  The premeditated murder of innocent creatures is ok while ridding the world of criminals isn’t?  Where do we draw the line? 

I have to agree with the death penalty because I think that it helps to set standards.  We make examples out of people and crime goes down.  How are we setting a good example to society when we allow people to have a “life” in prison?  There are many shows about prison life that show us what goes on.  Some prisons allow people to access to things like computers, books, and TV.  Others that are more strict allow inmates only 30 minutes of time outside and other than that they are confined to a small cell with nothing.  The thing that people also see on these prison shows is that the people behind the bars are still committing crimes! You would think that being sentenced to life behind bars would teach them a lesson and try to have them turn themselves around.  Instead they are digging themselves into deeper holes, which only makes society try to find other solutions to help them become less violent and takes the focus off of people with real problems like homeless and medical.  Our state funded money gets spent more on trials and programs for prisoners then it does for people who actually deserve life.  The death penalty helps in controlling the prison population, sets an example for others before they commit a crime, and serves as justice for victims’ families.  Technology has allowed us to correctly identify criminals allow for less error of killing and innocent person and lethal injection allows for a humane way of disposing of the criminals.


Facts:
Gandhi-“an eye for an eye” http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/30302.html
Camus-“capital punishment..” http://www.antideathpenalty.org/quotes.html
Tutu-“…Not justice”  http://www.antideathpenalty.org/quotes.html


Sunday, March 4, 2012

It's not easy being green.....

Hmmm what’s more important, the environment or the economy….. Well they are both green, they are both important, and both apply to people.  The environment is the world in which we live our lives and the economy is what motivates us to keep on living.  So if they both have a significant impact on us, then which one should we consider in saving first?  Without the environment we wouldn’t have an economy.  The environment provides us with resources we use in our daily lives and without it we would be in a barren place and the economy wouldn’t matter.  Let’s look at Africa for example.  Here is a country that has little economy because the environment around them provides little.  It is a place with massive desserts, little water sources, and scarce amounts of food.  People work very hard and use the resources that they have on hand in order to survive. .  So I think that we should work on fixing the world around us and then the economy will fix itself. 
There are many people out there, however, that believe that the economy is the thing that needs fixing first.  Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann calls the Environmental Protection Agency "job killing."  She believes that the economy and the environment are not equals.  The idea of telling people to be more environmentally friendly is a hard sale to make when the unemployment rate has become so low.  Newt Gingrich points out the rises gas prices and how he would like to fix them.  He claims that he could reduce gas prices to as low as $2.50 a gallon; reason being that, "the price of gasoline is becoming a genuine crisis for many American families. If it continues to go higher, it will crater the economy by August.”  So here we have examples of people who are for the economy, which we won’t have if the environment falls out on us. 
So how do we fix it?  First, tie environmental rescue to economic recovery, by "greening the bailout," as columnist Tom Friedman of the New York Times has put it.  We need to put more emphasis on helping the environment in order to help the economy.  If everybody played a part, even if it is a small part, we can make a difference.  I know, based from personal experience what we can do to make a difference.  I work at a bank and my manager decided to place more of a green effort on our branch alone.  We made sure lights were shut off when not needed, we recycled paper and cardboard boxes, and we kept the heat at a constant temperature as well as a few other things.  By making these adjustments we were able to see a significant difference month after month on our budget report, helping our branch and company to save money.   This helped us to see how much we have an impact on change and helped each of us to become better in our own lives.
 





 Facts:
-Tom Friedman-“greening the bailout”
-Newt Gingrich- “gas prices could crater the economy”
-Michele Bachmann- EPA is “job killing”